Google Advertisement
Creating a Faster Than Light Quantum Atomic Communication System - Potential Strategy
Alright along these lines, for a decent numerous years I've been attempting to concoct an approach to send data quicker than the rate of light. I continue perusing that it isn't possible, why you ask? Since Einstein guessed as much, still, that doesn't sound good to me considering what we know now and how quantum physical science should exist. The capacity of imparted sets, reciprocal particles to murmur, buzz, vibrate, or move paying little respect to area as one to each other, implies that we should have the capacity to send data thusly, by vibrating one and viewing the other.
One exploration paper recommends that "spooky activity at a separation" ventures 10,000 times the rate of light, still some say notwithstanding that doesn't mean you can send data in light of the fact that simple vibrations are not lucid, subsequently aimless. I say BS. Of course they are. Vibrating is on, on means one, and non-vibrating is off, and off means zero - so you can utilize double code. You should do nothing more than shave off electrons from the same molecule and keep them confined and have a code to utilize when perusing their vibrations. Best of all nobody else can read or capture the correspondence.
Further, if one could seclude the vibrational examples, one could utilize subsidiaries of those examples to perceive shapes against an opposite point and the course of go of both imparted sets, and by controlling the first molecule, you could watch the second and watch its vibrational way uncovering the message utilizing your code. Actually, we should have the capacity to do this, hypothetically, gave our estimation gadgets are precise and our capacity to control the initially imparted pair is exact.
Presently then, I assume I could get more play from this idea on the off chance that I just weaved it into a sci-fi story, and afterward let the human science get up to speed to these substances later on, and somebody could think back and say; "the creator of that sci-fi story anticipated this current." It's too terrible that human researchers are so brisk to say something isn't possible, simply in light of the fact that they don't know how to do it yet, or don't have the instruments to demonstrate such hypotheses are conceivable.
We are not remaining on the shoulders of titans, on the off chance that we neglect to every so often challenge their former determines, indeed, we are doing an injury to science when we do - further, it was those extremely researchers we regard the most, those with the huge leaps forward tested the gathered known information they could call their own time - so what's off with us in the present period - are we reluctant to test these old hypotheses. If you don't mind consider this and think on it.
One exploration paper recommends that "spooky activity at a separation" ventures 10,000 times the rate of light, still some say notwithstanding that doesn't mean you can send data in light of the fact that simple vibrations are not lucid, subsequently aimless. I say BS. Of course they are. Vibrating is on, on means one, and non-vibrating is off, and off means zero - so you can utilize double code. You should do nothing more than shave off electrons from the same molecule and keep them confined and have a code to utilize when perusing their vibrations. Best of all nobody else can read or capture the correspondence.
Further, if one could seclude the vibrational examples, one could utilize subsidiaries of those examples to perceive shapes against an opposite point and the course of go of both imparted sets, and by controlling the first molecule, you could watch the second and watch its vibrational way uncovering the message utilizing your code. Actually, we should have the capacity to do this, hypothetically, gave our estimation gadgets are precise and our capacity to control the initially imparted pair is exact.
Presently then, I assume I could get more play from this idea on the off chance that I just weaved it into a sci-fi story, and afterward let the human science get up to speed to these substances later on, and somebody could think back and say; "the creator of that sci-fi story anticipated this current." It's too terrible that human researchers are so brisk to say something isn't possible, simply in light of the fact that they don't know how to do it yet, or don't have the instruments to demonstrate such hypotheses are conceivable.
We are not remaining on the shoulders of titans, on the off chance that we neglect to every so often challenge their former determines, indeed, we are doing an injury to science when we do - further, it was those extremely researchers we regard the most, those with the huge leaps forward tested the gathered known information they could call their own time - so what's off with us in the present period - are we reluctant to test these old hypotheses. If you don't mind consider this and think on it.
Leave a Comment